Shortwave
stations in the 1970s and early ‘80s, when my listening was at its height, were
almost all operated by governments, and they broadcast in the languages of
listener nations. Some governments slanted programming in their ideological
interest, but the wide mix of perspectives – a forerunner to today’s podcasts
and audio streams -- enabled listeners to make up our own minds.
I started shortwave
listening in 1977, and Radio Havana Cuba soon won me with dazzling music programs
and persuasive stories of the revolution’s great social policy successes.
Radio Netherlands and
Japan’s NHK had particularly friendly informal programing. Radio Canada
International was fresh and clever. Deutsche Welle (Voice of West Germany),
Radio Stockholm Sweden, and Swiss Radio International were polished and
eclectic. And the BBC was, well, the BBC -- and in the ‘70s and early ‘80s it
was available to Americans only over shortwave.
But holding court as the
grandest of them all was Radio Moscow, and their best show was the twice weekly
“Moscow Mailbag,” featuring answers to questions from listeners, in our case to
their English language service to North America.
For years, Radio Moscow
announcers would read the full street addresses of those of us who mailed in
questions, which would range from, “Do you eat pizza in the USSR?” to queries
about human rights, the SALT treaty, Soviet housing shortages, and “Do the
movements for Women’s Liberation and equal rights for homosexuals exist in the
USSR?” (that was from me in 1978, and to summarize, the answer was: absolutely
yes on Women’s Liberation, and absolutely no on gay rights.)
So, from what place in America
would you think came this question I heard on Moscow Mailbag in 1979: “Is there
any bourgeois thinking left in the USSR?”
Try Hazard, Kentucky.
Someone deep in the flag waving, pickup truck driving, churchgoing mountains
asked such an objectively conscious question right out of a manifesto you wouldn’t
find in libraries for a hundred miles around Hazard.
When the Mailbag show was
repeated two hours later, I jotted down his address and immediately U.S. mailed
a letter to Robert Thomas of Hazard, Ky. which outlined my interest in the ideological
realm of his question. I was surprised to get a hand-written reply about a week
later.
I eagerly opened it, half expecting
that Mr. Thomas was a prankster, a government agent fishing for leftists, or a
holdover anti-poverty worker who had moved there in the 60s from New York or
Chicago, though I held out hope that somehow this person was a born-and-raised
Eastern Kentuckian.
Well he was. Robert was
passionately interested in socialism, and the “great Soviet people,” he penned.
Oh, and he was 14. That was six years younger than I, a person who had expected I’d be corresponding with one of my elders, like a veteran of the 1930s coal strikes.
Oh, and he was 14. That was six years younger than I, a person who had expected I’d be corresponding with one of my elders, like a veteran of the 1930s coal strikes.
More letters ensued in
which Robert said he had taught himself French, was fascinated with Beatles
music and attended a prestigious boarding school near Hazard. He sometimes went
with his family on shopping trips to cities including Louisville. When in the
city, they had crossed the Ohio River to Clarksville, Ind., Robert added, for
visits to the Green Tree Mall, which was 10 minutes from my home in New Albany,
Ind.
On a Saturday, a surprise
phone call came from a pay phone at that shopping venue, and minutes later, the
Green Tree Mall -- where I had worked my first job, played my first video game,
and bought my first necktie – became the place I met my first other young
radical.
Young, as in pulling two
crumpled dollar bills out of his blue jean pocket to pay for the soft drink he
insisted on buying me.
Robert was eager to please, and reassuringly impetuous,
like a 14-year-old should be. When exchanging left wing socialist observations
with me, he was relaxed and knowledgeable.
Two socialists amid the bourgeois bounty, Robert Thomas and I met here, in Clarksville, Indiana's Green Tree Mall in 1979. |
Who Robert’s family was
and how they felt about his championing the proletarian revolution was unknown
to me. A girl about his age walked toward us from the middle of the mall and
summoned him back to the Thomas party by calling “Hey Larry, we’ve got to go.”
The instant I asked about
the name Larry, I realized I should have let it go; leftists who don’t yet know
who they are dealing with would be wise to use aliases. And his name had to go
out to the whole of North America over Radio Moscow.
He seemed off guard and
uncomfortable during the moment it took him to explain, “that’s my middle
name.” His letters began coming from “Robert L. Thomas,” with the conspicuous
middle initial added seemingly to give credence to that explanation. But I
totally understood his need for a boundary between us. I may have been his
closest ideological friend between the Appalachians and the Rockies, but back
home, he’s a Marxist in Hazard, Kentucky, for goodness sake.
Other than that awkward
instant, Robert seemed happy and confident in the mall, and eager to
communicate more.
Telephone conversations in
the coming months revealed him to be every bit the classic 14-year-old –
excitable and capricious, with flights of fancy for new passions each time we
talked. His Beatles interest became all-consuming – when I asked him in a
letter what he thought were the biggest news stories of the soon-to end-1970s,
no. 1 on his list was the Fab Four’s breakup.
Robert and I were no
ideology’s rubberstamps. After explaining in a letter his great enthusiasm for
the Marxist economic methods, he added: “Unfortunately, socialism isn’t perfect,”
mentioning such disparate matters as Stalinist cruelties and booby traps set
for U.S. soldiers by the Vietcong.
And as for the stereotype
that during the me-generation period, a 14-year-old who listens to shortwave
and knows socialist ideology must be an isolated nerd, forget it. Robert told
me of his girlfriends, dalliances, and age typical hormone-driven wishes.
Pornography entered his
life, and he said his mother stringently objected to that. During a phone call,
I explained that my understanding of Marxism (another of Robert’s tendencies
his mother disliked) placed porn into the category of exploitation.
“Tell her pornography is
bourgeois self-indulgence and your Marxist beliefs are the best thing you have
going for you to fight the porn,” I said. I didn’t think
Robert would give that any consideration, but he immediately lit up,
exclaiming: “Hey, that’s right!”
Turning away from the
phone he shouted: “Mom, pornography is bourgeois self-indulgence and my Marxist
beliefs are the best thing I have going for me to fight the porn!”
You’re welcome, Mrs.
Thomas.
In subsequent letters and
phone calls, Robert talked up Hazard as an educated and elegant town that had been maligned as a backwater. He also said he had a ham radio system and he showed vast knowledge
of the amateur radio technology. Ham lets a user broadcast, not just listen,
and Robert began prodding me to buy and learn such a system, so we could talk
without tying up our families’ lines or running phone bills up.
A very Robert-like young person using a Ham radio. |
This was pre-internet so
sending a missal was more involved -- and receiving one was a special occasion.
Opening a hand-addressed envelope from someone whose observations you value brought
a feeling of anticipation so percolating that you had to be careful not to tear
the letter itself.
And over time, the relatively
elaborate effort involved in letter writing made that habit vulnerable to life’s
distractions, and my contacts with Robert would ebb and flow. I recall a letter
in which my friend seemed less enthusiastic, then contact between us waned for five
or six months.
Then, in mid or late 1981,
Robert wrote again. I sensed that this letter would be different, perhaps
because of the long disconnect.
Robert’s penchant for jumping
from passion to passion was evident again.
“I have become a
born-again Christian,” he wrote. That alone did not portend any shift to the
right. This was a time of Liberation Theology and anti-nuke nuns, when Bob Dylan
and Noel Paul Stookey had called themselves born-again Christians. Of course, it was
also a time of Rolex-wearing hucksters making tax-free millions on their TV
ministries.
In a phone call, Robert still
seemed free thinking, though more sedate. He neither denounced nor praised his radical
left views. In a subsequent letter, which I believe was the last I received
from him, Robert told me he would attend Moody Bible Institute in Chicago.
Perhaps out of respect for
Robert’s situation, or because it would have been awkward, I neglected ever to ask
Robert the pertinent question, what is your actual name? Sounds silly that I
never knew with certainty what it was; I mean we weren’t secret agents. But
given his place and his views, guarding his real ID may have been called for.
In online searches in the
decades hence, all I have found is that Thomas clearly was not his last name. Combinations,
including that name that his relative uttered in the Green Tree Mall, have not connected
with anyone at Moody, his boarding school, or the city of Hazard, Ky.
I do not know if Robert, Larry
or whoever, went on to denounce “satanic Marxism” along with pornography,
promiscuity and booze as the evils cleansed by his born-againness, or whether
he is still a leftist who sees Karl Marx’s philosophy as being in line with the
prophets of the old testament condemning greed.
Or maybe he went on to recycle
2-litres, buy home video, donate sweaters to the shelters, have a beer now and
then, vote for Gore and keep the doctrinal zeal under control.
Wherever you are my anonymous
friend, I’m sure a visit with you, in a mall or elsewhere, still is
unforgettable.
Brian Arbenz lives in Louisville, Ky. USA. For this true story, the name Robert Thomas, and the middle name Larry, are changed from the name his real life friend used over shortwave radio, in letters and in person.
A mystery! Hope he’s doing well, and didn’t succumb to Christian Right brainwashing.
ReplyDeleteI have confidence in him.
ReplyDelete