Check that spelling, please! |
He said one of his reviews of a title through the self-publishing firm iUnivese was scathing, and justifiably so: the book on Bobby Fischer was so horribly written, it had the chess grandmaster’s name spelled two different ways throughout!
“I will never review another book published through iUniverse,” he said. “So what have you been up to?”
The truthful answer would have been: I have self-published two sci-fi books -- through iUniverse. I had been eager to tell him of these works, but tipped off by his story, my response suddenly came out: “Oh, you know, the usual -- mowing the lawn, paying bills.”
Be assured, my sci-fi works, titled “Out From It All” and “Worlds,” had all names spelled consistently, and met higher literary quality standards as well. But the fact that the same company could let such rubbish as that Fischer fiasco roll off its presses was pretty disconcerting.
And it was more than an indictment of the booming self-publishing business.
I soon began to hear reports that the conventional book publishing industry’s standards as well were eroding.
The premier and the, uh, senator? |
The much heralded “Astronaut Wives Club,” which has enlightening detail about the stresses and despairs endured by the women married to NASA’s Mercury, Gemini and Apollo astronauts, also refers to the kitchen debate between “Senator Richard Nixon” and Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev in 1959. That’s six years after Nixon went from senator to vice-president.
Throughout the audio version of Lilly Koppel’s book, the last name of Betty and Gus Grissom is pronounced “Grisham.”
If NASA had standards that sloppy, the Eagle would have landed in downtown Cleveland.
In the genre of baby boomer TV memories, we might not expect quite as much scholarly devotion as in books about great events like the moon landings. But my jaw still dropped when I saw posted reviews of actor Frank Bank’s memoirs of his years as Lumpy Rutherford on “Leave It To Beaver.”
They said Bank’s “They Call Me Lumpy” included gross factual errors about plots of episodes involving him -- plots any Beaver fan would know well. Then there were accusations by reviewers that Bank’s writing was frequently ungrammatical, to the extent that large parts of his book amount to nothing more than notes thrown together.
What happened to copy-editing, proofreading and fact-checking? Those get in the way of the modern goal of rapidly getting books out and reaping quick receipts from the ability of the enticing promotional paragraphs to prompt purchases by clicks.
And since e-publishing is the way these days for books and news reporting, errors can always be corrected later when enough of the readers post their complaints.
Which is another tribute to contemporary capitalism’s deftness at replacing qualified professionals with free “crowd sourced” labor.
We are in a time of regaining our awareness of ideals that were diminished in the era of “shock jock” raunchiness. Empathy and nuance are two of them. Let us add “professionalism” to the list.
__________________________________________________________
Brian Arbenz lives in Louisville, Ky. USA
I think some of is technology driven. Autocorrect can be a problem along with working from a screen. I found a repeated sentence at a page break while reading an ARC and it was harder to verify than just moving paper. That said, there's no excuse for that in professional publishing.
ReplyDeleteI believe the pioneering of online purchases via infomercials -- for the Miracle Slicer and Zamfir music -- devastated the book publishing industry. Sales became about prompting immediate clicks, instead steadily persuading. Hyper speed became far too important.
ReplyDeleteAs a former English teacher and magazine editor and a lover of the English language, it’s like a knife through my heart when I see books and magazines that look like they haven’t even tried to edit them. Seeing egregious errors in tv shows and commercials bugs me all the time. I think it’s gotten to the point where they just publish books as them come in — without editing them — and with so much self publishing, you pretty much get whatever effort the writer wants to put into it. I hope getting it right makes a comeback, but they don’t have much incentive, as people don’t seem to care.
ReplyDeleteYou are people, Katherine Bond, and you care, and you’re not alone. Take heart knowing that many do care about quality, have noticed the decline, and are discussing the subject with the aim to build a system that rewards quality over quantity.
ReplyDeleteI sincerely hope so, Samuel Smith. It seems that people are only looking for quick profit nowadays with no pride in their work.
ReplyDeleteKatherine Bond, I first experienced the quality decline in the music publishing industry. I was part of a chamber ensemble that sought newly published works every season, and some of the editing was so awful the notation couldn’t be trusted.
ReplyDeleteHome computer typesetting of music (e.g., Finale) was the death toll. The negative effects were several. Composers were now expected to present fully typeset manuscripts for publication, and the relative ease at which typeset music could be churned out created a rush for output. These computer programs did all the formatting work for you, but you really had to keep a sharp eye out for required adjustments, which are unavoidably many.
This reliance on Finale, for one, spawned a new generation of composers who composed at the computer for quick output, which negatively affects the creative process. It may be fine if you’re creating pop music like EDM or hip hop, but writing classical music requires an intimate knowledge of instruments and their idiosyncrasies. Just because you like how it sounds on MIDI playback doesn’t mean it will actually work with living breathing humans.
I can usually tell with one glance whether music I just received was set in Finale, and then my stomach sinks. It almost always heads to the recycling bin.
My sister (who composes symphonies) agrees with you 100%, pianomad. Finale and Sibelius are useful tools for people who have already had proper training.
ReplyDelete